Contractors Become Employees

Not long ago, starting a business in the on-demand economy seemed straightforward.

Step 1: Come up with an idea for an on-demand service. Food delivery? Valet parking? Postal service? Great.

Step 2: Hire independent contractors to do the job and save on paying employee benefits.

Step 3: Expand from city to city and watch the company valuation rise.

For a while, it worked. According to venture capital database CB Insights, more than $9 billion was invested in the on-demand economy over the last five years. Companies such as Uber and Airbnb achieved multibillion-dollar valuations without ever having to own the cars or apartments from which they made money. They didn't have to burden themselves with many actual employees either. Pundits described the on-demand "gig" economy as the way of the future. Hillary Clinton even considered it significant enough to put on her campaign agenda.

But the hype may be just that. Over the last two months, an increasing number of companies in the on-demand industry have announced plans to transition their independent contractors to employees. In the last two weeks alone, on-demand food delivery service Sprig, valet parking service Luxe and grocery shopping and delivery service Instacart said they were phasing out some of their independent contractor roles and bringing on those workers as employees, complete with benefits such as workers' compensation, unemployment insurance, social security and Medicare payments and, depending on hours worked, health insurance. Those benefits, experts say, can easily add 30% to each employee's compensation package.

With two big players in the on-demand economy, ride-hailing services Uber and Lyft, facing class-action lawsuits over worker misclassification, it's easy to blame litigation for the sea change. But attorney Gillian Overland, whose Los Angeles firm specializes in employment matters, said it's an "oversimplification" to say these companies are overhauling their business models because other companies are getting sued.

"It's certainly part of it," Overland said. "But the lawsuits, if anything, force companies to look at themselves and make the determination whether their business model is appropriate."

More than a year into the game, on-demand companies such as Shyp, for shipping items, and Instacart are realizing that relying on independent contractors, while an easy and cheap way to start a business, usually doesn't allow for worker training or control over when they work.

These two factors alone present growth hurdles.

"We considered [making our couriers employees] before we launched — it was actually in our original pitch deck," said Shyp's head of communications, Johnny Brackett. "But we weren't sure if it was going to be necessary. We thought they were just couriers, so we could hire independent contractors because they weren't going to need any training."

Luxe Chief Executive Curtis Lee echoed a similar sentiment, saying the company launched a little more than a year ago using independent contractors because it thought it would be enough.

"We thought we could deploy a valet to go park someone's car and that was it," Lee said.

Both companies realized that the independent contractor model — while cheaper and easier than hiring employees — was riddled with shortcomings.

In Shyp's case, the couriers were the company's only human point of contact with customers, yet the lack of worker training meant the couriers often couldn't answer customer queries about what happens to packages after they're picked up. Not being able to train couriers on how to handle packages also presented potential customer satisfaction problems.

"When people are packing a 60-inch flat-screen TV, they need to know what they're doing," Brackett said.

For Luxe, the company didn't necessarily have to train its valets to park a car, but it couldn't tell its valets when to work — a problem when a service needs to meet high demand during certain hours and evenings. Luxe incentivized valets to work late on Friday and Saturday nights by paying them bonuses — not unlike Uber's surge pricing feature — but even then, it could not guarantee enough workers on a given night.

It's no surprise that companies are now realizing that they need to invest in their workers to build a sustainable business, according to Raj Narayanaswamy, co-founder of time-sheet and management software firm Replicon.

It's business 101, he said. "It's the realization you can't build a business based on subsidies. You can use it to get things started, but for sustainable growth you need to build a solid foundation," he said, noting that companies that rely on their workers to "subsidize" the business by paying their own expenses and receiving no training or benefits ultimately pay for it through loss of customer trust and satisfaction. "So these start-ups are going back and rethinking their business model," he said. "They're doing the right thing."

This doesn't mean every on-demand service provider is going to make the switch, though. According to San Francisco employment and labor attorney Stephen Hirschfeld, for some companies such as Uber, it makes more sense for their workers to remain independent contractors because on-demand ride-hailing may not require the level of control or training as parcel delivery or grocery shopping.

"I think you have to look at it on a case-by-case basis," Hirschfeld said.

Ultimately, what we're seeing in the on-demand economy is par for the course for new industries, according to CB Insights researcher and data analyst Matthew Wong.

A few years ago, the app-based on-demand economy as we know it didn't even exist. Companies are now reaching a tipping point at which they have to nail down a business model they can carry with them into the future, or risk burning themselves, their workers and their customers.

"It's important to realize this area is still very young, and there will be other innovations within the model," Wong said. "Time will tell whether some of the companies are able to figure it out."

Original Source: Los Angeles Times

Get started today.
Set up a free trial based on your business needs. Start Free Trial

5 Steps to Proactive Resource Management for Services Firms

As a business leader, you do your best to make your service organization successful. You invest in the latest technologies, hire the best candidates, and get all the essential resources…Read More

Calculating the ROI of Your Projects with Time Tracking

Before initiating a project, professional services firms want to know how much profit and revenue they can generate for the company. Return on Investment (ROI) analysis helps firms to evaluate…Read More

Humanizing the Time Tracking Tool

Benjamin Franklin once said, ‘Time is money’ and nowhere is truer than in business. Time is a strategic asset that is extremely limited. Businesses that use their limited time productively…Read More

Time and Attendance Orientation Guide

In a growing business, the day will eventually come when managing time and attendance on paper becomes both inefficient and risky, especially when trying to balance things like overtime, paid…Read More

Using shared services? These five technologies are a must

As organizations continue to scrutinize operating costs and look for areas to drive efficiencies, shared services centers (SSCs) are a no-brainer. The concept of a multi-function SSC has been around…Read More

Employee time tracking is dead

iBeacons, Bluetooth Low Energy, Proximity sensing and the obsolescence of time tracking as we know it. Businesses have to track the time their employees work for a variety of reasons,…Read More
  • Polaris
  • Time & Project Insights
  • Time & Projects Solutions
  • Replicon Products
  • Replicon Users
  • Cloud
  • Corporate
  • Professional Services Management
  • Shared Services Management
  • Time and Attendance Management
  • Customer Feature
  • Time Intelligence
  • Industry News
  • Global Compliance Updates
  • Others