Lack of compliance costs a restaurant chain dearly in FLSA penalties

Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)

Ruby Tuesday Inc., a nationwide chain that operates more than 750 restaurants, recently agreed to pay out a staggering $3 million to settle a class action wage-and-hour lawsuit involving over 4,000 non-exempt former employees. The District Court in New York certified the suit as a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) collective action in June 2013. Ruby Tuesday was alleged to have violated the FLSA by failing to compensate employees for all hours worked, and for denying employees overtime pay that they were otherwise entitled to receive.

Ruby Tuesday’s corporate policies discouraged overtime and required employees to perform “off the clock” work. Restaurant managers allegedly avoided overtime compensation by “shaving” time off employee timecards that were close to hitting the 40 hour threshold, requiring employees to work “off the clock” before and after shifts, and by not allowing employees to clock in until the scheduled start of their shift, or until after attending pre-shift meetings.

The strict timekeeping policies that the company had in place were partially to blame for this litigation mess. According to the class and collective action complaint, Ruby Tuesday’s had implemented a company-wide labor-scheduling system. Employee hours were tracked through an electronic timekeeping system, which required a manager’s authorization before an employee could even successfully clock in. Each restaurant in the chain was running “End of Day” Reports on a daily basis, which tracked how many hours each employee worked, and were monitored by both corporate headquarters as well as management at individual restaurant locations.

What is so shocking in this case is the level of insight into daily labor costs that the company’s management across the country was privy to. The company monitored its labor costs so closely and so frequently that it would be extremely hard, if not impossible, for any manager who had access to this information to claim that they did not know what was going on. The problem was that labor costs overshadowed labor compliance. The labor analytics available to the company were so comprehensive that there was plenty of opportunity for someone within the company to have connected the dots as to what was going on.

Yet compliance was put on the backburner, because curtailing labor costs took precedence. Nobody took a step back and questioned whether there were any unintended consequences resulting from corporate policies intended to control overtime costs. These “End of Day” Reports, accordingly the complaint filed in the lawsuit, could not be run until all employees were clocked out.

One of the many preventable solutions that could have helped the company avoid this entire mess could have been as simple as adding a screen prompt before these reports were run, requiring managers to indicate whether or not all employees had left the work premises. Reports with a “no,” indicating that employees were still on the premise, would have been red flags alerting corporate management to potential “off the clock” work. However, nothing of such nature was done, and that mistake is now costing Ruby Tuesday’s $3 million.

This case is just one example of compliance efforts being sidestepped due to the lack of a system to monitor potential FLSA violations.

Jon Burns
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Jon Burns
Jon is a Product Manager at Replicon who leads the Global Compliance Team. Replicon is an industry leader in global compliance and has a dedicated team which pro-actively monitors international labor regulations for ensuring proper adherence with specific country rule requirements.
Get started today.
Set up a free trial based on your business needs. Start Free Trial

The Future of Project Resource Management in Professional Services

When it comes to PSA, automation is (literally) the name of the game. We turn to machine learning and AI to make our processes easier and cut down on the…Read More

If You Want Profitability, You Cannot Ignore Resource Utilization

After an enormously challenging year, professional services firms are trying to get back on track to achieve their growth and profitability goals. To do so, it has become more important…Read More

Reduce Revenue Leakage and Drive Efficiency in Professional Services

Imagine traveling in a boat that has a small hole at the bottom. The boat is slowly filling with water, and unless you do something to fix that hole, it…Read More

5 Ways to Improve Service Delivery in Your Organization

In a highly competitive market, service-based businesses need to capitalize on any opportunity to set themselves apart from their (often very similar) competitors. While implementation, system details, and service management…Read More

Demystifying the millennial workforce: 5 tips from Trunk Club’s Andrew Anderson Devine

Time magazine labels the millennial generation the “most threatening and exciting generation,” infamous for “narcissism [and] its effect: entitlement.” In the workplace, the perception of the millennial workforce is no…Read More

Exempt vs non-exempt workers: simplify employee classification

In the United States, most jobs are governed by the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which classifies workers into two broad categories: exempt and non-exempt. Under the FLSA, non-exempt employees are…Read More
  • Polaris
  • Time & Project Insights
  • Time & Projects Solutions
  • Replicon Products
  • Replicon Users
  • Cloud
  • Corporate
  • Professional Services Management
  • Shared Services Management
  • Time and Attendance Management
  • Customer Feature
  • Time Intelligence
  • Industry News
  • Global Compliance Updates