Contact Us Contact Us Replicon Login

Global Compliance Desk – California

  • Replicon Facebook
  • Replicon Twitter
  • Replicon LinkedIn
  • Replicon pintrest

California On-Call Workers Entitled to Pay even when not Scheduled to Work

The Second Appellate District of California held that the retail employees who had to “call-in” 2 hours before their scheduled shift to find out if they have to report to work were entitled to “reporting time pay”.

The California Court of Appeal n February 4, 2019,  issued their majority and dissenting opinion in Ward v. Tilly’s, Inc. It appears to be a precedent-setting ruling in California, holding that an employee scheduled for an on-call shift may be entitled to certain wages for that shift despite never physically reporting to work. Each of California’s Industrial Welfare Commission (“IWC”) wage orders requires employers to pay employees “reporting time pay” for each workday.

Implication for Employers

California employers are bound by the Appellate Court decision and should review and if needed revise their reporting policies accordingly to avoid liability.

  • This decision strays from the general understanding of most employers that “the reporting time pay”, only covers the situation which the employee physically enters work but is sent home early (usually due to lack of work). California employers are bound by the Appellate Court decision and should revise their reporting policies accordingly to avoid liability. The court agreed that employees were “reporting for work” within the meaning of state law (Wage Order 7).
  • The Supreme Court continues to demonstrate its inclination toward favoring workers on issues of compensation and benefits in the face of legitimate employment policies. In addition, employers should not assume that they are clear if they are not involved in the commercial sector.
  • Although California Appellate court applied Wage Order No.7, most IWC wage orders share the same language in terms of time pay for reporting. The prudent employer in California should, therefore, assume that the Appellate Court decision applies to their company.

 

 

Edited by: Shreya Bhattacharya

Disclaimer: The material provided above is for informational purposes only and is subject to change. We endeavor to keep all material up-to-date and correct but make no representations about the information's completeness, accuracy, or reliability. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change and interpretation based on individual factors that may differ between organizations. The material is not meant to constitute legal advice and we suggest you seek the advice of legal counsel in connection with any of the information presented.
  • Replicon Facebook
  • Replicon Twitter
  • Replicon LinkedIn
  • Replicon pintrest
Sajid Mir

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Sajid Mir

A labor and employment lawyer at Replicon who specializes in global compliance. Replicon provides award-winning products that make it easy to manage your workforce. Replicon is an industry leader in global compliance and has a dedicated team which pro-actively monitors international labor regulations for ensuring proper adherence with specific country rule requirements.

X

Automate your Scheduling with Replicon's AI-Powered Workforce Management Platform

scroll top