Global Time and Gross Pay: The Risks of Achieving Only 80% Compliance (1/3)

As businesses grow and expand beyond their initial locations, gain diverse employee types, and need to comply with varying labor laws, centralized payroll becomes a challenging issue with respect to driving growth. And by extension, global time and gross pay — which directly contributes to 60% of time and effort in payroll — becomes a high priority item on any company’s list. Still, addressing the payroll challenges of multi-location growth isn’t always easy.

In particular, global labor compliance issues are on the rise — wage and hour litigation has skyrocketed by 358% since the year 2000 in the United States. This issue isn’t just limited to the US; litigation for unpaid wages has cost Australian businesses over $250 million in the past decade, Japan is attempting to remedy its rampant overtime problem, and labor disputes are on the rise in the Philippines, South Africa, the UAE and China. For leaders managing gross pay and compliance, each day presents a new challenge.

In our three-part Global Time and Gross Pay blog series, we’ll first discuss the pitfalls of partial compliance, then common challenges in global payroll, and, ultimately, how to achieve streamlined global time and gross pay.

Legislative compliance is the #1 issue facing payroll

Global payroll is rife with difficulty, and the road to successful global payroll delivery can be plagued by limited regional capabilities, organizational inconsistency in remuneration and benefits, administration costs, and a variety of other challenges and setbacks. And yet, by far the most prevalent and persistent global payroll delivery challenge is legislative compliance, with 27% of respondents citing it as the primary issue their payroll faces in Ernst & Young’s Global Payroll Survey.

In practice, payroll leaders get 70% to 80% coverage of their workforce using traditional vendors and ecosystems. It’s the remaining 20% to 30% payroll use cases that create a challenge for businesses and payroll leaders. Teams end up spending the bulk of their time and effort managing what seems like a fringe case. This remaining 20% use case presents two primary problems:

Traditional vendors leave businesses exposed

global time and gross payMost multi-location, global businesses are well aware of the challenges of compliance and the risks of noncompliance, which is why best-in-class companies automate their time management processes — to the extent possible — with well-known vendors that support time and gross pay needs. Still, this means that the top 20% of countries that likely house 70% to 80% of your employees (the US, Canada, UK, etc.) are covered, but remaining countries present a challenge. Businesses are left with the tough decision to either get help from local vendors in exchange for high startup costs and marginal ROI, or continue to manually manage time and gross pay for these smaller locations.

Need United States compliance detail? Check out our State-By-State Compliance Guide to find specific labor law updates for different states. 

Managing multiple vendors across locations

Global, multi-location businesses have to deal with localization needs, the wide range of variation in local labor laws, and the balancing act between their ultimate ROI and the investment and effort they put into these different payroll processes across locations. If there are union or collective bargaining agreements at any of these locations, the complexity increases multifold. Without proper processes and systems, companies can leave themselves vulnerable to major payroll errors, overpayments and underpayments, employee disengagement, and — most significantly — labor litigation.global time and gross pay

To cover the remaining 20% of their workforce, companies will resort to using different local vendors in their various smaller locations. Businesses end up spending a significant amount of money on different local solutions that aren’t fully automated, which ultimately results in messy, inefficient payroll practices. Many of these edge-case scenarios require manual intervention and cumbersome tracking in Excel, and almost always still risk compliance issues when they can’t fully accommodate local laws, multiple employee types, specific business policies, and other variations in requirements. Additionally, fixed startup costs for these local vendors means that businesses end up paying disproportionate amounts to accommodate what is sometimes only a few employees in different regions.

Conclusion

Companies need to be aware that successfully managing global time and gross pay requires them to find and deploy systems that are extremely configurable and can handle the eccentricities associated with each of the locations they do business in.

In addition to problems with compliance, ad-hoc global time and gross pay processes can present additional challenges.

Stay tuned for Part 2 of our series, where we’ll discuss problems surrounding administrative overheads and inconsistent global payroll data.
Regina Mullen
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Regina Mullen
Regina is the Workforce Management Expert & Content Marketing Associate for Replicon. Replicon provides award-winning products that make it easy to manage your workforce. With complete solution sets for client billing, project costing, and time and attendance management, Replicon enables the capture, administration, and optimization of your most underutilized and important asset: time.
Get started today.
Set up a free trial based on your business needs. Start Free Trial

Webinar Recap: Uncover Huge Profits with Accurate Project Time Tracking

As remote employees become part and parcel of the new normal, most leaders are beginning to realize that they need a better way to manage their projects, people, time and…Read More

Replicon Announces Time Intelligence Platform for Cloud-based Solutions from SAP for the Professional Services Industry

Replicon Time Tracking for Service Organizations Delivers a Single Source of Truth for Time. Redwood City, CA – October 22nd, 2020  – Replicon announced today that its Time Tracking for…Read More

Global Compliance Desk – Maine, United States

New Earned Employee Leave in Maine Governor Janet Mills signed L.D. 369, An Act Authorizing Earned Employee Leave, in May 2019, which will become effective on January 1, 2021. Currently,…Read More

Top 10 Ways to Get Employees to Fill in Timesheets

  It comes as no surprise to anyone in the business world that there is one cardinal rule when it comes to employee time tracking: employees hate to fill out…Read More

Will AI replace consultants?

The onset of AI and smart machines automating formerly-human jobs has been discussed at length as of late -- often in relation to manufacturing and manual labor jobs. And yet,…Read More

6 steps for fast-tracking profitability in your consulting practice

Advice aimed at entrepreneurs and small businesses tends to be heavily product-oriented, but in reality the majority of US small businesses fall under the “Professional, Scientific, Technical, and Other Services”…Read More
  • Cloud
  • In The News
  • Corporate
  • Professional Services Management
  • Project and Program Management
  • Shared Services Management
  • Time and Attendance Management
  • Workforce Management
  • Customer Feature
  • Feature Update
  • Time Intelligence
  • Industry News
  • Webinar Recap
  • Global Compliance Updates